Evidence Hub

An analysis of satisfaction with complete immediate (over)dentures

Jonkman RE, van Waas MA, van 't Hof MA, Kalk W

Journal of dentistry, 1997

74 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to investigate denture satisfaction related to treatment modality, age, gender, denture quality, chewing ability, denture experience and patients' attitude towards denture wearing.

METHODS: In a randomized controlled clinical trial 74 patients who required immediate denture therapy were treated either with complete immediate dentures, or with complete immediate overdentures on the lower canines with and without Dyna Direct magnetic attachments. All patients were evaluated clinically and by questionnaires over a one year period after denture insertion.

RESULTS: Regression analysis showed that the quality of the denture, chewing ability, attitude towards dentures in general and the expectation of the new dentures can explain the variance in denture satisfaction for 23-27%.

CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that with respect to satisfaction the technical quality of the dentures, as well as patients' previous attitude towards wearing dentures are the most important factors in immediate denture treatment. The treatment modality, having received an overdenture or not, appeared to be unimportant in this respect in the first year after denture insertion.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free