Evidence Hub

Computer-based training for safety: comparing methods with older and younger workers

Wallen ES, Mulloy KB

Journal of safety research, 2006

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Computer-based safety training is becoming more common and is being delivered to an increasingly aging workforce. Aging results in a number of changes that make it more difficult to learn from certain types of computer-based training. Instructional designs derived from cognitive learning theories may overcome some of these difficulties.

METHODS: Three versions of computer-based respiratory safety training were shown to older and younger workers who then took a high and a low level learning test.

RESULTS: Younger workers did better overall. Both older and younger workers did best with the version containing text with pictures and audio narration.

DISCUSSION: Computer-based training with pictures and audio narration may be beneficial for workers over 45 years of age.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Computer-based safety training has advantages but workers of different ages may benefit differently. Computer-based safety programs should be designed and selected based on their ability to effectively train older as well as younger learners.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free