Evidence Hub

Analysis of ultrasonic atomized inhalation of antibiotics in infant pneumonia treatment

Wang H

Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2018

200 participants

Abstract

To observe and analyze the specific nursing pattern for ultrasonic atomized inhalation of antibiotics in infant pneumonia treatment, 200 children with pneumonia treated in our hospital were enrolled as the study subjects. All the patients were treated with ultrasonic atomized inhalation of antibiotics. The children were divided into a reference group treated with general conventional nursing and a study group treated with targeted nursing. The nursing effect was compared in the two groups. Observation of overall treatment efficacy of the two groups showed that the study group is superior to the reference group, P<0. 05; comparison of the recovery time of clinical symptoms and signs between the two groups showed that the study group needs a shorter time to restore cough, fever, asthma, and lung rales. P<0.05; the self-developed satisfaction questionnaire survey shows a higher satisfaction in the study group, P<0.05. In infant pneumonia treatment with ultrasonic atomized inhalation of antibiotics, targeted nursing patterns should be adopted to improve overall treatment efficacy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free