Evidence Hub

Task performance with base-in and base-out prism

Sheedy JE, Bailey IL, Buri M, Bass E

American journal of optometry and physiological optics, 1988

10 participants

Abstract

The effects of base-in (BI) and base-out (BO) prism upon performance of four occupational-like tasks were measured on a group of 10 subjects who had normal binocular vision. Performance on tasks which required depth perception was significantly poorer when subjects wore prism glasses with 8 and 12 delta BI and BO, whereas 4 delta BI and BO did not significantly affect performance. The performance decrements with prism (3.0 to 6.7%) were considerably less than those induced by denial of binocularity (20 to 30%) as measured in a previous study. Thus, vergence-inducing prism does impair task performance but not as much as does the denial of binocularity. The reading and counting tasks did not require critical depth judgement and were much less affected by the prism than the needle-threading and pointers-and-straws tasks.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free