Double phototherapy with Wallaby optic fibers versus conventional phototherapy. Case reports
Abstract
The authors have valued the efficacy of the double phototherapy with fiberoptic Wallaby vs conventional phototherapy in 2 groups of term infants, without any complication at birth, utilized respectively as study group and control group. While conventional phototherapy produced a bilirubin reduction of 0.60 +/- 0.26% per hour (with a total reduction of 28.1 +/- 11.1%), the double phototherapy was statistically more effective (p 0.05). Our study shows that double phototherapy with Wallaby fiberoptic and conventional phototherapy represent a valid strategy in the treatment of the non haemolytic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, because, compared to conventional phototherapy, double phototherapy is more effective and reduces the period of the treatment, showing a simple management of the jaundiced newborn.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.