Evidence Hub

Acute controlled wood smoke exposure induces sensory airway irritation without detectable changes in small airway mechanics in healthy adults: A randomized crossover study

Sehlin M, Öhberg F, Boman C, Muala A

Environmental research, 2026

11 participants

Abstract

Background: Residential wood combustion is a major source of ambient particulate matter in Northern Europe and is associated with adverse respiratory health outcomes. However, the acute effects of short-term wood smoke exposure on small airways remain incompletely characterized.

Objective: To investigate the acute effects of controlled wood smoke exposure on airway function in healthy adults, with specific emphasis on small airway mechanics, spirometry, and respiratory symptoms.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind crossover-designed study, 14 healthy non-smoking adults (11 men, 3 women; mean age 26 years) underwent 2-h chamber exposures, under two occasions, to wood smoke (PM1: 453 ± 13 μg/m3) and to filtered air separated by a three-weeks washout period. Lung function was assessed before and after each session using Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT, tremoFlo®) and spirometry. Symptoms were recorded on a modified Borg scale at 30-min intervals.

Results: Exposure to wood smoke significantly elicited nasal irritation (p = 0.003) and showed trends toward increased cough and unpleasant odor perception. No exposure-specific changes were detected in spirometric parameters or oscillometric resistance parameters (R5, R5-R19, R5-R20). Reactance (X5) and resonant frequency (Fres) showed significant time-dependent changes irrespective to exposure condition (p < 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusions: Short-term controlled wood smoke exposure induced sensory upper airway…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free