Evidence Hub

Association between shoulder joint radiation dose and arm morbidity in the randomized breast cancer trial SENOMAC

Alkner S, Appelgren M, Szulkin R, Wieslander E, Rogowski V, Gustafsson CJ, Nissen HD, Sackey H et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

868 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Postoperative lymph node irradiation can affect shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients, yet widely accepted dose-volume constraints for the shoulder joint are lacking. The SENOMAC trial randomized patients with breast cancer and 1-2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or SLN biopsy only. We aimed to analyze the association between the radiation dose to the shoulder joint and patient-reported arm morbidity one and three years after surgery using SENOMAC data.

Methods: Radiotherapy plans from 868 Swedish SENOMAC patients randomized 2015-2019 were collected. The humeral head was auto-segmented, and a 1 cm margin added to represent the shoulder joint. Arm morbidity was assessed using the Lymph-ICF questionnaire, focusing on questions regarding physical arm function and shoulder-related mobility tasks.

Results: The radiation dose was evaluable for 386 patients receiving ALND and 421 receiving SLN biopsy. The dose distribution to the shoulder joint was similar in both study groups. In the SLN group, a higher near-maximum dose (D0.5cc) was associated with significantly worse arm morbidity scores three years after surgery, particularly among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. No association was found in the ALND group. No dose thresholds for development of arm/shoulder related side effects could be identified.

Conclusion: Our results indicate a possible association between maximum radiation dose to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 868 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free