Evidence Hub

Anterior midcingulate cortex activity during pain catastrophizing predicts and sequentially tracks reduction in pain interference after cognitive behavioral therapy in fibromyalgia

Lee J, Lee J, Lazaridou A, Paschali M, Anzolin A, Grahl A, Ellingsen DM, Loggia ML et al.

Pain, 2026

98 participants

Abstract

Abstract: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and functional disability. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to alleviate FM symptoms, but the neural mechanisms underlying CBT's effectiveness in reducing functional impact remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the temporal dynamics of clinical and neural responses to CBT. We conducted a longitudinal randomized controlled neuroimaging trial with 98 patients with FM assigned to an 8-week CBT or education intervention. Functional MRI (fMRI) data were collected at baseline (PRE), midtreatment (MID, at 4 weeks), and post-treatment (POST) while participants engaged in task-evoked pain catastrophizing during the fMRI scan session. Clinical outcomes, including pain interference and catastrophizing, were assessed at all time points. The CBT group demonstrated early (MID-PRE, P < 0.05) and late (POST-MID, P < 0.005) reductions in pain interference and catastrophizing. Anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC) activity during pain catastrophizing task tracked symptom improvement over time and predicted early vs late improvements over the 8-week course of CBT. Moreover, machine learning models indicated that baseline aMCC activation was a more accurate predictor of treatment response than baseline levels of patient-reported pain and catastrophizing. This study provides evidence that brain activity during pain catastrophizing plays a critical role in tracking and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free