Evidence Hub

On the value of radiomics in addition to clinical measures in emotional conflict fMRI for predicting sertraline response in major depressive disorder

Chen M, Marquering HA, Ruhé HG, Reneman L, Caan MWA

Scientific reports, 2026

Abstract

Most patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to first-line treatment, and robust predictors of individual outcomes are lacking. Functional MRI (fMRI) has shown promise for identifying treatment-relevant brain markers, but standard analyses often rely on mean activation within regions of interest (ROIs). Emotional-conflict fMRI elicits spatially heterogeneous, potentially clinically relevant activation, which radiomics can capture by quantifying the texture and distribution of voxel-wise activity. In this preregistered study, we tested whether radiomic features improved the prediction of treatment response compared to mean fMRI ROI activation at baseline (week 0) and early-treatment (week 1) of 254 MDD outpatients participating in the EMBARC RCT (123 sertraline, 131 placebo). Across models, clinical variables provided the strongest predictive signal, and imaging-only models showed limited predictive utility. Placebo but not sertraline response could be predicted at week 1 early-treatment with three combined models incorporating different levels of imaging information, although not at week 0 baseline. In our regression analysis, combined models including mean ROI features yielded modest performance for sertraline (baseline: r = 0.22; early-treatment: r = 0.29; P 0.05), whereas whole-brain models modestly improved prediction (baseline: r = 0.29; P = 0.0012). Early clinical measures remained the strongest predictors with higher importance than radiomic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free