Comparison of a novel pen-like electrode and standard patch electrodes for perineal muscle stimulation in women: a pilot study
Abstract
Objective. Intracavitary electrical stimulation is widely used in the treatment of urinary incontinence. However, it is contraindicated for a subset of patients, for whom current external electrode alternatives offer limited adaptability and therapeutic flexibility. This study compared the performance of a mobile, pen-like electrode with fixed external patch electrodes for pelvic floor muscle electrical stimulation in asymptomatic volunteers. The proposed electrode enables sequential stimulation of motor points and visual monitoring of muscle contraction, aiming to overcome limitations associated with intracavitary and fixed patch approaches.Methods. A parallel-group study (1:1) was conducted with 28 asymptomatic participants without diagnosed pelvic floor dysfunction (mean age: 25.4 ± 4.1 years; BMI: 22.8 ± 2.5 kg m-2). Participants were randomly allocated to Group A (pen-like electrode, n = 14) or Group B (fixed patch electrodes, n = 14). Both groups underwent 12 sessions of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) using identical stimulation parameters. The primary outcome was the change in maximum vaginal pressure, measured by perineometry, after 12 sessions. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for intra-group comparisons and independent t-tests for inter-group comparisons, with effect size estimation using Cohen'sd. For all statistical tests, we usedα = 0.05.Results. The increase in vaginal pressure was significantly greater in Group A than in Group B. Group…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.