Evidence Hub

Diabetes and Performance Status Predict Severe, Persistent Radiation Proctitis: Long-Term Endoscopic Findings From STELLAR Trial

Wang N, Xu T, Li H, Shuai J, Ma H, Fang H, Song Y, Chen B et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

74 participants

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the long-term endoscopic natural history of chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) and identify predictors of severe lesions in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from the STELLAR study (NCT02533271) .

Methods and materials: This secondary analysis included 74 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing anal-preserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (39: short-course radiation therapy/total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT] and 35: long-course chemoradiation therapy [CRT]). Systematic endoscopic follow-up (>2 years) was performed, with mucosal damage graded by the Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS). Multivariate analyses identified factors for severe (VRS ≥3) and persistent severe CRP.

Results: The incidence of VRS ≥3 CRP was 33.3% (TNT) versus 20.0% (CRT) (P = .197). Endoscopic severity peaked at 2 years after radiation. A distinct recovery trend was observed in the TNT group, but not in the CRT group. Diabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor for both severe CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 5.46; 95% CI, 1.25-23.89; P = .024) and persistent severe CRP (HR, 6.09; 95% CI, 1.23-30.23; P = .027). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 predicted persistent severe CRP (HR, 8.81; 95% CI, 1.50-51.68; P = .016).

Discussion: Hypofractionated radiation therapy (TNT) did not increase severe CRP risk and showed a favorable recovery pattern. Diabetes and reduced performance status are strong, independent predictors of severe and persistent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free