Evidence Hub

Factors associated with arm swelling in patients undergoing surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer within the FAST-Forward trial nodal sub-study

Ravindra S, Cafferty FH, Harris E, Gulliford S, Miles E, Patel J, Sydenham MA, Kumar S et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

469 participants

Abstract

Purpose/objective: The FAST-Forward randomised nodal sub-study primary analysis showed non-inferiority for 5-year patient-reported arm/hand swelling following adjuvant breast/chest wall and axillary radiotherapy given in 26 Gy in 5 fractions (Fr) over 1 week compared to 40 Gy in 15Fr over 3 weeks. This subsequent analysis investigates the association between patient, tumour and treatment factors and development of long-term arm/hand swelling.

Material/methods: Data from 469 patients randomised to adjuvant radiotherapy 40 Gy/15Fr, 27 Gy/5Fr or 26 Gy/5Fr to breast/chest wall and axilla (any or all levels 1-4) in the FAST-Forward nodal sub-study were included. DICOM-RT data were collected prospectively. ESTRO-defined axillary nodal levels 1-4, the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel juncture (ALTJ), and visible seroma were contoured retrospectively. Mean, maximum and minimum doses were extracted. Univariable and stepwise multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors of 5-year arm swelling.

Results: At 5 years, moderate/marked arm/hand swelling was reported by 39/299 (13%) patients and clinician-reported arm lymphoedema by 45/346 (13%). Multivariable analysis identified axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (OR 3.70, 95% CI [1.61-8.48], p = 0.002) and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (OR 3.31 [1.08-10.12], p = 0.036) as significant predictors of 5-year patient-reported moderate/marked arm/hand swelling. For 5-year clinician-reported arm lymphoedema, multivariable analysis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 469 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free