Evidence Hub

Mature Outcomes of 61.2 Gy Concomitant Boost Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538

Bogart JA, Wang X, Masters G, Komaki R, Gaspar LE, Heymach J, Dobelbower MC, Kuzma C et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: We report mature outcomes of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer randomly assigned to the 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB) thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) arm of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30610/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0538. The CB arm was discontinued after planned interim analysis; however, the study provides the largest prospective data set using 61.2 Gy CB TRT.

Methods and materials: Eligible patients had limited-stage small cell lung cancer with regional lymph node involvement and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. TRT began with either the first or second (of 4 total) cycle of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy planning was required. In the initial phase of the trial, patients were randomly assigned with a 1:1:1 allocation to 45 Gy twice daily, 70 Gy once daily, and 61.2 Gy CB TRT.

Results: Ninety-three patients were assigned to receive 61.2 Gy CB TRT. After a median follow-up of 115 months for surviving patients, median overall survival and progression-free survival were 32.3 months (95% CI, 20.4-44.8 months) and 15.4 months (95% CI, 10.0-24.0 months), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 28.5% (95% CI, 20.6-39.6). Rates of grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic adverse events were 40.9% and 25%, including 16% dysphagia and 7% severe pulmonary toxicity.

Conclusions: CB TRT outcomes appear similar to contemporaneous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free