Evidence Hub

Pelvic nodes ultra-hypo fractionated versus conventionally fractionated IMRT with HDR brachytherapy in prostate cancer: interim analysis of a collaborative multi-institutional non-inferiority phase 3 trial (PCS-XI, NCT05820633)

Fabi F, Crook J, Jolicoeur M, Rauth S, Koll W, Tisseveransinghe S, Ebacher A, Niazi T et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

142 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Ultra-hypofractionation (UHF) has emerged as a safe and effective strategy; however, its role in prostate cancer (PCa) pelvic nodal irradiation combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains insufficiently defined. PCS-XI (NCT05820633) is a multicentre, phase III randomized trial evaluating pelvic UHF versus conventionally fractionated (CF) radiotherapy. We report a prespecified interim analysis focusing on toxicity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods: Men with unfavorable-intermediate to very-high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CF (43 Gy/20 fractions, 44 Gy/22 fractions, or 46 Gy/23 fractions) or UHF (25 Gy in 5 fractions delivered every other day) whole pelvis radiotherapy, combined with single-fraction 15 Gy HDR-BT to the prostate with concomitant ADT. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) and PROs (IPSS, SHIM, EPIC-26) were collected longitudinally.

Results: At interim analysis, 142 patients were randomized (CF = 73; UHF = 69), with a median follow-up of 17.6 months. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics, ADT exposure, and treatment volumes were well balanced between arms. Grade 2-3 GU and GI toxicity rates were low and comparable between arms. No grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. Longitudinal PRO analyses demonstrated parallel trajectories. Clinically meaningful differences favoring UHF were observed for urinary incontinence at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 142 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free