Evidence Hub

A controlled trial comparing dosimetry and radiation pneumonitis between tomotherapy and IMRT in patients with lung or esophageal cancer

Zhang A, Zhang Y, Yang J, Chen L, Wu N, Qian J, Dai H, Yang D et al.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026

56 participants

Abstract

Backgroud: The expanding clinical use of helical tomotherapy (HT) has raised concerns regarding its potential to increase low-dose lung exposure and the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in thoracic radiotherapy. While a few retrospective studies have compared dosimetric parameters and RP rates between HT and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), their findings remain inconsistent, necessitating a prospective randomized controlled trial for clarification.

Purpose: To prospectively compare dosimetric parameters and the incidence of RP between HT and IMRT in patients with lung or esophageal cancer.

Methods: Patients eligible for thoracic radiotherapy were enrolled. Both HT and IMRT plans were designed and optimized for each patient, with a prescription equivalent dose in 2 Gy /fraction (EQD2) ≥50 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Plans were evaluated based on target dose coverage, dose-volume histograms, and other dosimetric indices. RP was diagnosed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). Risk factors for RP were identified using univariate analysis.

Results: Between February and September 2022, 110 consecutive patients with lung or esophageal cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the HT group (n = 54) or the IMRT group (n = 56). Compared with IMRT, HT had a significant reduction in lung V20 (p = 0.002) and mean lung dose (p = 0.013). Furthermore, the HT group exhibited a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free