Evidence Hub

A randomised, placebo-controlled trial in healthy humans of modified cellulose or psyllium evaluating the role of gelation in altering colonic gas production during inulin co-administration

Reid JESJ, Alhasani AT, MacCalman T, Amor D, Aliyu AI, Modasia AA, Harris H, Warren FJ et al.

Food & function, 2026

30 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Dietary fibre is vital for a healthy diet, yet many people avoid it because of symptoms induced by colonic gas. Slowing rapid fermentation decreases colonic distention and reduces symptoms, allowing for better tolerance of prebiotics. Co-administration of inulin, a fermentable fibre, with psyllium, a gel-forming fibre, reduces gas production in irritable bowel syndrome patients compared to administering inulin alone, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. We hypothesise that psyllium polysaccharides' physically cross-linked gel resists gastrointestinal shear forces and impairs microbial access to inulin, thereby delaying fermentation. Methylcellulose is another physically cross-linked fibre ingredient, widely used in food production for its tunability and affordability. Our aim was to develop a preparation of methylcellulose of comparable functionality to psyllium. A formulation of methylcellulose with comparable rheological and inulin release behaviour was developed in vitro. We subsequently performed a randomised, three-way, placebo-controlled non-inferiority study with healthy volunteers (n = 30), comparing the slowing of fermentation of inulin by co-administering with psyllium, methylcellulose or a control maltodextrin. Fermentation in vivo was assessed by breath hydrogen measurements for 24 hours after ingestion. While psyllium significantly reduced initial breath hydrogen production compared to the placebo, a non-inferior effect on reduction in initial breath…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free