Evidence Hub

"A 10-years follow-up of Photodynamic Therapy for nodular basal cell carcinoma: a randomized comparing the effectiveness of Aminolevulinic acid-PDT, Methyl aminolevulinate-PDT, and surgery"

Salvio AG, Requena MB, Stringasci MD, Silva AP, Buzza HB, Veneziano DB, Oliveira ER, Medero MM et al.

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2025

567 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Topical Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is a well-studied and effective treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and pre-malignant lesions. Developing a cheaper approach to this treatment involves local production of aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL). Furthermore, a prospective study to verify its clinical effectiveness and advantages was required.

Objective: This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of MAL-PDT and ALA-PDT treatments for BCC using photosensitizers produced in Brazil, and compared with surgical treatment as a third arm, all with long-term follow-up.

Methods: 567 patients with small nodular BCCs were randomized for ALA-PDT, MALPDT, or surgical treatment. Both PDT groups had a 30-day post-treatment biopsy for cure rate assessment, and a clinical 10 years-follow-up was performed.

Results: The 30-day post-treatment biopsy showed a complete response of 90.4 % for ALA-PDT (171/189 patients) and 86.1 % for MAL-PDT (161/187), while surgery showed free margins in 97.2 % (177/182). Considering 5 and 10 years of follow-up, 93.7 % and 92.8 % of recurrence-free survival rate for surgery, respectively, while 78.6 % and 74.5 % for ALA-PDT, and 73.1 % and 69 % for MAL-PDT were observed.

Conclusion: Surgery remains the gold standard treatment for nodular BCC; however, if non-surgical treatment is chosen, both ALA-PDT and MAL-PDT achieve similar effectiveness and recurrence-free survival rates. While surgery has already yielded…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 567 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free