Evidence Hub

Omission of axillary lymph node dissection in ultrasound-detectable axillary metastases in primary breast cancer treated by upfront surgery: prospective randomized SENOMAC-ULTRA non-inferiority trial

de Boniface J, Meretoja T, Rydén L, Sund M, Karlsson P, Huang CS, Kim HJ, Ryu JM et al.

BJS open, 2026

1,380 participants

Abstract

Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer causes substantial arm morbidity and long-term functional impairment. Less extensive axillary surgery, such as targeted axillary dissection (TAD), significantly reduces this risk. Although omission of ALND is standard in clinically node-negative disease with limited sentinel node involvement, this is not the case for patients with clinically node-positive disease undergoing upfront surgery. The aim of the SENOMAC-ULTRA trial is to evaluate whether TAD can safely replace ALND in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer receiving upfront surgery.

Methods: SENOMAC-ULTRA is a prospective, international, multicentre, randomized non-inferiority trial. Adults with stage II-III invasive breast cancer and axillary metastases detectable by ultrasound and confirmed by fine needle aspiration or core biopsy are eligible for inclusion. Participants are randomized 1 : 1 to TAD (removal of marked metastatic nodes plus sentinel lymph node biopsy) or standard ALND. The primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival, assessed for non-inferiority using a Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, locoregional recurrence, regional nodal recurrence, distant relapse-free survival, invasive breast cancer-free survival, patient-reported arm morbidity, and health-related quality of life, as well as performance measures of axillary ultrasound and marking techniques. A sample size of 1380…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,380 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free