Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose Versus Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Omejec G, Tumpaj VP, Dolinar G, Podnar S, Snoj Ž

Muscle & nerve, 2026

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Ultrasound (US)-guided perineural injection therapy (PIT) with corticosteroids (CS) or 5% dextrose in water (D5W) is commonly used to relieve symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, comparative data beyond short-term follow-up are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of US-guided PIT using D5W and CS over a 12-month follow-up period.

Methods: Patients with bilateral mild to moderate CTS participated in a randomized, double-blind, within-subject trial. Each patient's right hand was randomly assigned to receive D5W or CS, while the contralateral hand received the alternate treatment. Primary outcomes included the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity (BCTQs) and functional status (BCTQf) scales and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A single US-guided PIT was performed using 6 mL of injectate: 5% dextrose or triamcinolone acetonide diluted with saline. Clinical assessment, nerve conduction studies, and ultrasonography were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Fifty-seven patients (114 hands) were included in the analysis. Both D5W and CS produced similar improvements, with the greatest symptom relief observed within the first 3 months. Clinically meaningful improvement in BCTQs was observed in approximately 50% of hands in both groups at 1 and 3 months, and in 29% (D5W) and 25% (CS) at 12 months.

Discussion: US-guided PIT with D5W and CS provides comparable clinical benefit over 12 months in mild…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free