Evidence Hub

Optimisation of blinking exercises for dry eye disease

Wolffsohn JS, Travé-Huarte S, Bahra I, Finch C, Anyaegbu U, Garcia-Porta N, Kingsnorth A

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2025

98 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: Blinking exercises can reduce the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease, but the optimum technique, repetitions and repeats/day are unclear. Hence, this study used an instructional app to assess the best routine for blinking exercises.

Method: In the optimisation stage, dryness symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI-6-item), Symptom Assessment Questionnaire iN Dry Eye (SANDE), and the time the eyes were comfortable for after a blink (the Blink Test) were assessed in 98 participants with dry eye before and after 2 weeks of blinking exercises, as well as 2 weeks after completing the blinking exercise routine. Participants were randomised between a squeeze and blink compared to blink only regimen, 2 to 4 repeats per day and 5 to 25 repetitions each time. A second efficacy study with 28 participants with dry eye disease assessed the optimum app parameters based on symptom severity and frequency, blink rate/completeness, tear film stability and volume, along with ocular surface staining over the same time period.

Results: Overall, blinking exercises reduced symptomatology (p 0.05). However, there was no significant effect on the blink rate, non-invasive tear breakup time, tear meniscus height or corneal staining (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Fifteen repeats of close-squeeze-open cycles, 3x/day was the optimum blinking exercise routine, reducing symptoms, number of incomplete blinks and conjunctival staining.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free