Evidence Hub

Tumor Purity as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Postoperative Radiation Therapy Outcomes in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Transcriptomic Analysis From the Lung ART Trial

Zrafi WS, Albarrán-Artahona V, Dall'Olio FG, Ghigna MR, Signolle N, Cozic N, Adam J, Lacroix L et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

285 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: Tumor purity (TP), the proportion of malignant cells within a tumor sample, is an important feature of the tumor microenvironment. Using transcriptomic data from the Lung ART-IFCT 0503 trial, we investigated the relevance of TP and its potential to predict benefit from postoperative radiation therapy (PORT).

Methods and materials: RNA sequencing was successfully performed on 285 samples. TP was inferred using the ESTIMATE algorithm. Associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models.

Results: Among 285 patients with resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer, 144 received PORT. The median age was 61 years, 31% were women, and 80% had nonsquamous histology. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. The median TP was 0.64 (range, 0.41-0.92) and was slightly higher in the PORT arm (0.65 vs 0.63; P = .006). TP correlated with H&E pathologist-estimated cellularity (r = 0.23, P -6). Transcriptomic analysis confirmed associations with proliferation-related pathways and reduced hypoxia signatures (false discovery rate < 0.001). TP inversely correlated with T-cell immune infiltration by immunohistochemistry (CD3⁺ r = -0.52; CD8⁺ r = -0.45). High-TP was associated with worse OS (48.5 vs 106.5 months, P < .001) and DFS (18.4 vs 48.0 months, P = .017). A TP × PORT interaction was observed for OS (P = .049) and a trend for DFS (P = .07).

Conclusions: TP reflects…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 285 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free