Evidence Hub

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone Vs Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy for T1-T2N0M0 Oropharyngeal Cancers: Results from A Randomized Controlled Trial

A. Budrukkar, V. Murthy, S. Kashid, M. Swain, V. Rangarajan, S. Laskar, Sadhana Kannan, S. Kale et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2023

46 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone vs IMRT+ brachytherapy (BT) in patients with T1-T2N0M0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients with stage I and II OPSCC were considered for IMRT to a dose of 50Gy/25#/5 weeks in phase I followed by randomization (1:1) to further treatment with IMRT (20Gy/10#/2 weeks) or BT (192Ir high dose rate - 21Gy/7fractions/2 fractions per day). The primary endpoint of the trial was the reduction in xerostomia at 6 months evaluated using 99mTc salivary scintigraphy. Severe salivary toxicity (xerostomia) was defined as post-treatment salivary excretion fraction ratio <45%. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between November 2010 to February 2020, 90 patients were randomized to IMRT(N=46) alone or IMRT+BT(N=44). Eleven patients (8 residual/recurrent disease, 2 lost to follow up, 1 second primary) in the IMRT arm and 9 patients (8 residual/recurrence, 1 lost to follow up) in the BT arm were not evaluable at 6 months for the primary endpoint. At 6 months, xerostomia rates using salivary scintigraphy were 14% (5/35: 95% CI 5%-30%) in the BT arm while it was seen in 44% (14/32: 95%CI 26%-62%) in the IMRT arm (p=0.008). Physician rated RTOG grade ≥2 xerostomia at any time point was observed in 30%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free