Evidence Hub

Functional Lung Avoidance for Individualized Radiotherapy (FLAIR): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

B. Yaremko, D. Capaldi, K. Sheikh, D. Palma, A. Warner, A. Dar, E. Yu, G. Rodrigues et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2022

14 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if functional lung avoidance based on 3He MRI improves quality of life (QOL) for patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with stage III NSCLC (or oligometastatic disease treated with curative intent) undergoing CCRT with at least a 10 pack-year smoking history were eligible. Patients underwent pre-treatment 3He MRI to measure lung ventilation and had two radiotherapy (RT) plans created before randomization: a standard plan, which did not make use of the 3He MRI, and an avoidance plan, preferentially sparing well-ventilated lung. All participants were blinded except the physicist responsible for exporting the selected plan. The primary endpoint was patient-reported QOL measured at 3-months post-RT by the FACT-L lung cancer subscale (LCS); secondary endpoints included other QOL metrics, toxicity, and survival outcomes. Target accrual was 64.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were randomized before the trial was closed due to slower-than-expected accrual, with 11 randomized to the standard arm and 16 to the avoidance arm. Baseline patient characteristics were well-balanced. At 3 months post-RT, the mean±SD LCS scores were 17.4±2.8 vs. 17.3±6.1 for the standard and avoidance arms, respectively (P=0.485). A clinically meaningful, pre-specified decline of ≥3 points in the LCS score was observed in 50% (4/8) in the standard arm and 33% (4/12) in the avoidance arm (P=0.648). Two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free