Evidence Hub

Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Predicts Poorer Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Postmastectomy Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

Guang-Yi Sun, Shu-Lian Wang, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Wei-Hu Wang, Yue-Ping Liu, H. Ren, H. Fang et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2020

598 participants · 54 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine if radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) affects survival of patients with breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Post-hoc analysis of data of 598 breast cancer patients from a randomized controlled trial comparing postmastectomy hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT; 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT; 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks). Mean peripheral lymphocyte count (PLC) at different time points in the two groups were compared by the t-test. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Baseline PLC (pre-PLC) was comparable between HFRT and CFRT patients (1.60 ± 0.57 × 109/L vs. 1.56 ± 0.52 × 109/L; P = .33). In both groups, the PLC declined steadily during the course of radiotherapy but started to recover at 1 month after radiotherapy. Incidence of lymphopenia was significantly lower in HFRT patients (45.4% vs. 55.7%; P = .01). Nadir PLC (nadir-PLC) was significantly higher in HFRT patients (1.08 ± 0.37 × 109/L vs. 0.97 ± 0.31× 109/L; P < .001), as also the nadir-PLC/pre-PLC ratio (0.72 ± 0.28 vs. 0.67 ± 0.28; P = .02). Median follow-up was for 57.6 months (IQR: 38.5-81.4). The 5-year DFS was significantly lower in patients with nadir-PLC/pre-PLC ratio <0.8 than in those with ratio ≥0.8 (71.8% vs. 82.6%; P = .01); however, OS was comparable between the groups (85.8% vs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 598 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free