Evidence Hub

Minocycline Reduces Chemoradiation-Related Symptom Burden in Patients with Non–small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Randomized Trial

X. Wang, Q. Shi, T. Mendoza, S. Lin, Joe Y. Chang, Raza H. Bokhari, Hui-Kai Lin, A. Garcia-Gonzalez et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2019

49 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) exacerbates a cluster of difficult-to-manage symptoms, especially cancer-related fatigue. Minocycline is a readily available, low-cost antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties. We conducted a phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of minocycline in reducing CRT-symptom burden in NSCLC. Methods and Materials: Patients with NSCLC scheduled to receive CRT provided consent and were randomized to receive either minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or a matching placebo during 6 to 7 weeks of CRT. Patient-reported fatigue and other symptoms were assessed on MD Anderson Symptom Inventory weekly from the start of CRT for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was 12-week (±2 days) area under the curve (AUC) for symptom burden, which was compared between treatment groups. Results: Forty of 49 enrolled patients (80%) were evaluable (19 on minocycline and 21 on placebo). There were no grade 3+ adverse events related to the study medication. Fatigue was significantly reduced in the minocycline group compared to placebo group during the 12-weeks trial period (AUC=31.2±14.2 vs. 45.0±20.9, P=0.011), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d=0.77). Pain (Cohen’s d=0.54) and shortness of breath (Cohen’s d=0.55) were also significantly reduced in the minocycline group (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Minocycline during CRT for NSCLC was feasible, had a low toxicity…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free