Evidence Hub

Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms with Hippocampal Avoidance during Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001

V. Gondi, S. Deshmukh, P. Brown, J. Wefel, T. Armstrong, W. Tomé, M. Gilbert, A. Konski et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2023

57 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Initial report of NRG Oncology CC001, a phase III trial of whole-brain radiotherapy plus memantine (WBRT+memantine) with or without hippocampal avoidance (HA), demonstrated neuroprotective effects of HA with median follow-up less than 8 months. Herein, we report the final results with complete cognition and patient-reported outcomes and longer-term follow-up exceeding one year. METHODS: Adult patients with brain metastases were randomized to HA-WBRT+memantine or WBRT+memantine. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive function failure, defined as decline using the reliable change index on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA), and/or the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory with Brain Tumor Module and EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Between July 2015 and March 2018, 518 patients were randomized. Median follow-up for alive patients was 12.1 months. The addition of HA to WBRT+memantine prevented cognitive failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74, p=0.016), and was associated with less deterioration in TMT-B at 4 months (p=0.012) and HVLT-R Recognition at 4 (p=0.055) and 6 months (p=0.011). Longitudinal modeling of imputed data showed better preservation of all HVLT-R domains (p<0.005). Patients who received HA-WBRT+Memantine reported less symptom burden at 6 (p<0.001 using imputed data) and 12 months (p=0.026 using complete-case data; p<0.001 using…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free