Evidence Hub

Diminishing returns from ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

I. Vogelius, S. Bentzen

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2020

13,384 participants · 43 citations

Abstract

Introduction: More than a decade of randomized controlled trials in prostate cancer have established a positive radiation dose response at moderate doses and a consistently low α/β ratio in the linear quadratic model for moderate hypofractionation. The recently published large randomized trial of ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer radiotherapy adds substantially to our current knowledge of dose-response and fractionation sensitivity. Methods and Materials: Randomized trials of dose-escalation and hypofractionation of radiotherapy are meta-analyzed to yield the overall best estimate of the α/β ratio. Additionally, a putative saturation of dose effect previously reported at approximately 80 Gy EQD2 is investigated by mapping the relative effectiveness assessed at five years onto a single reference dose-response curve. Results: Meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials including 13,384 patients yields a best estimate of α/β=1.6 Gy [95% CI: 1.3 to 2.0 Gy], but with highly significant heterogeneity (I2=70%, P=0.0005). Further analysis indicates an association between increasing dose per fraction in the experimental arm and increasing α/β ratio (slope: 0.6 Gy increase in α/β per Gy increase in fraction size, p=0.017). This deviation from the linear quadratic model could, however, also be explained by biochemical control maxing out at doses above approximately 80 Gy. Conclusions: Biochemical control data from randomized controlled trials of dose-per-fraction escalation in prostate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 13,384 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free