Evidence Hub

Mitigation of late renal and pulmonary injury after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

E. Cohen, M. Bedi, Amy A. Irving, E. Jacobs, R. Tomic, J. Klein, C. Lawton, J. Moulder

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2011

55 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

Purpose To update the results of a clinical trial that assessed whether the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril was effective in mitigating chronic renal failure and pulmonary-related mortality in subjects undergoing total body irradiation (TBI) in preparation for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods and Materials Updated records of the 55 subjects who were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial were analyzed. There were 28 on captopril and 27 on placebo. The definitions of TBI-HSCT-related chronic renal failure (and relapse) were the same as in the 2007 analysis. Pulmonary-related mortality was based on clinical or autopsy findings of pulmonary failure or infection as the primary cause of death. Follow-up data for overall and pulmonary-related mortality was supplemented by use of the National Death Index. Results The risk of TBI-HSCT-related chronic renal failure was lower in the captopril group (11% at 4 years) than in the placebo group (17% at 4 years) but this was not statistically significant (p>0.2). Analysis of mortality was greatly extended by use of the National Death Index, and no patients were lost to follow-up for reasons other than death prior to 67 months. Patient survival was higher in the captopril compared with the placebo group, but this was not statistically significant (p>0.2). The improvement in survival was influenced more by a decrease in pulmonary mortality (11% risk at 4 years in the captopril group vs. 26% in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free