Evidence Hub

Staffing Utilization and Fall Prevention With an Electronic Surveillance Video System: A Randomized Controlled Study

Daley B, Fetherman B, Turner J

Journal of nursing care quality, 2020

1,032 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited research addressing how to optimize both staffing and patient outcomes with the use of technology to reduce falls during hospitalization.

PURPOSE: We compared the effects of 2 staffing patterns in conjunction with the use of an electronic surveillance system on patient falls on an inpatient medical unit.

METHODS: Study participants were randomized to receive electronic surveillance system monitoring with a dedicated rounder or electronic surveillance system without a dedicated rounder. Falls during the study period were analyzed.

RESULTS: Of 1032 patients, there were 8 falls during the 3-month study. Six falls occurred in the intervention group, with no rounder, and 2 occurred in the group with a dedicated rounder. The data showed no statistical significance but had clinical implications.

CONCLUSION: In response to our findings, the dedicated rounder will function as a mobility technician, providing support to our nursing staff and a resource for fall risk patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,032 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free