Evidence Hub

Limits of laryngeal mask airway in patients after cervical or oral radiotherapy

Giraud O, Bourgain JL, Marandas P, Billard V

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1997

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the efficacy of the LMA in patients with previous oral or cervical radiotherapy, without upper airway obstruction.

METHODS: In nine patients after oral or cervical radiotherapy, efficiency of ventilation was assessed after induction of general anaesthesia and LMA insertion. Fibreoptic examination through the tube was performed to check the position of LMA.

RESULTS: In patients who had had oral radiotherapy, all five had limited mouth opening and in two, LMA insertion was difficult but permitted good ventilation. In the four patients who had had cervical radiotherapy, LMA insertion was easy but, in two, the lungs were difficult to ventilate and, in two, the lungs could not be ventilated and orotracheal intubation was required.

CONCLUSION: In patients with limitation of mouth opening after oral radiotherapy, LMA may represent an alternative to tracheal intubation. In patient with cervical sclerosis after radiotherapy; the use of LMA should be avoided.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free