Evidence Hub

Light intensity and visual acuity following cataract surgery

Berler DK, Peyser R

Ophthalmology, 1983

133 participants

Abstract

The authors analyzed 310 cataract operations that were randomly distributed between two operating rooms, each containing a microscope with different light intensities. The light intensity of one microscope was almost threefold greater than the other. One hundred seventy-seven patients were excluded from this study because of medical or ocular problems that might affect visual acuity. The remaining 133 patients are the subjects of this paper. Seventy-one were operated upon under high intensity light, and 62 were subjected to lower illumination in the operating room. Visual acuity after operation was correlated with type of microscope, age, sex, method of cataract extraction, and use of intraocular lenses. Reduced visual acuity (20/40 or worse) was consistently more common with high intensity light and with increasing age. Further investigation is recommended to establish the cause of this reduced acuity.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 133 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free