Evidence Hub

A Pipeline for MRI-Guided dose painting by number radiation Therapy: GLIORAD - a phase I-II clinical trial in recurrent glioblastoma

Botti A, Sghedoni R, Orlandi M, Paolani G, Ciammella P, Giaccherini L, Iotti C, Iori M

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2026

12 participants

Abstract

Background/objectives: The dose painting by number (DPBN) technique is a radiotherapy approach guided by imaging biomarkers. This paper investigates the physical/technical aspects addressed in a phase 1-2 study (GLIORAD, NCT04610229) employing the DPBN technique on patients affected by recurrent glioblastoma.

Methods: The DPBN approach was employed on 12 patients, converting the pixel-by-pixel Apparent Diffusion Coefficient map to a prescription dose ranging from 30 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The DPBN maps were discretized in a patient-specific number of levels (DPBC), prescribing a different dose to each level. The agreement between the calculated dose distribution (TDD) and DPBC map was assessed. Plan quality and robustness against geometric uncertainties were evaluated. Patient-specific quality assurance was performed before treatment, and the agreement between measured and calculated doses was assessed with the γ metrics.

Results: A good agreement between DPBN and DPBC maps was observed with a median[range] of the quality factor introduced by Vanderstraeten of 0.067[0.038; 0.137]. In addition, the agreement between TDD and DPBC map was of 0.77[0.44; 0.93], indicating satisfactory conversion in deliverable dose distribution. All plans resulted to be deliverable with a median [range] of γ(10%) of 98.55% [88.3; 99.9] and robust against geometric uncertainties with a dose difference to the 99% of the volume < ±5% in 11/12 patients.

Conclusion: The workflow of DPBN approach for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free