Evidence Hub

Effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on prostate and tumor morphology prior to MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer

Virtanen I, Mäkelä P, Sainio T, Högerman M, Nurminen P, Ettala O, Anttinen M

International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2026

Abstract

Background: Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) enables precise, temperature-controlled therapy, but its 3 cm ablation radius may limit coverage in large prostates or capsule-adjacent tumors. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) may improve treatment feasibility by reducing prostate and tumor size.

Methods: In this prospective, single-arm pilot study (NCT05917860), 15 treatment-naïve patients with organ-confined, intermediate-risk ISUP 2-3 PCa and at least one biopsy-concordant PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesion received 3-month nADT with degarelix before whole-gland TULSA. Multiparametric MRI was performed at baseline and monthly thereafter to assess prostate and lesion volumes, tumor-capsule relationship, and urethra-capsule distance.

Results: All patients completed nADT. Across 27 PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, four patients had unifocal disease, and 11 had multifocal disease (2-3 lesions). Twenty lesions were ISUP Grade Group 2 and three were Grade Group 3. PSA declined by 87% (-7.6 ng/mL; 95% CI. -9.7 to -5.7; p p p p 30 mm.

Conclusion: Short-term nADT with degarelix was associated with significant changes in prostate and tumor morphology. Future studies should determine whether these changes improve TULSA outcomes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free