Evidence Hub

Anti-focus driving signals to mitigate bone heating during focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids with phased arrays

Sadeghi-Goughari M, Jones RM, Hynynen K

Physics in medicine and biology, 2026

Abstract

Objective. During magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatment of uterine fibroids, ablating tissue near the spine is challenging as unwanted far-field bone heating can cause pain and potentially injure nearby nerves. This study investigates an anti-focus (AF) scheme for minimizing bone heating when targeting fibroid tissue in proximity to the spine.Approach.Acoustic and thermal simulations were conducted using 3D MRI-derived anatomical models from ten patients who underwent MRgFUS for uterine fibroids using a low-frequency (0.5 MHz) 6144-element flat fully-populated modular phased array during a clinical trial (NCT03323905). AF points were distributed over patient spine surfaces with varying densities, transducer array element-wise phase and amplitude controls were obtained via Tikhonov regularization, and the resulting temperature fields were compared to those obtained via both conventional focusing (CF) and a transducer module partial blocking (PB) approach developed to mitigate far-field bone heating (Goudarziet al(2024Med. Phys.518670-87)). Optimal regularization parameter values were chosen to maximize the focal-to-bone heating ratio (ΔTratio) while maintaining focal integrity.Results. For high point densities (0.25 AF mm-2), AF driving signals provided significant improvements in ΔTratiocompared to CF (fold improvement: 13 ± 16,p= 0.0009) and the optimal PB approach (fold improvement: 11 ± 11,p= 0.0009), at the cost of more diffuse focusing (focal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free