Evidence Hub

Definitive, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and endocrine therapy without surgery for select low-risk breast cancers: A prospective, phase II trial

Shaitelman SF, Krishnamurthy S, Rauch GM, Lin H, Shen Y, Valero V, Johnson HM, Muruganandham M et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

19 participants

Abstract

Background: Early-stage, hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer has excellent outcomes with lumpectomy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy (ET), prompting interest in treatment de-escalation. Advances in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) raise the possibility of definitive local therapy without surgery in select patients. We conducted a prospective, phase II trial (NCT02945579) evaluating SABR with ET as a non-operative strategy.

Materials and methods: Patients aged ≥ 40 years with cT1N0M0, unicentric, HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer received 3 months of ET followed by SABR in 5 fractions. Vacuum-assisted image-guided core biopsy of the tumor bed was performed 6-12 months after SABR. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) omitted surgery. Co-primary endpoints were pCR and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Patient-reported outcomes were collected as a secondary endpoint. A Bayesian framework evaluated futility using posterior probabilities to assess a clinically meaningful pCR rate.

Results: Twenty patients were enrolled (median age 70.5 years). Nineteen underwent biopsy after SABR. pCR was observed in 10/19 patients (53%, 95% CI 30-73%), and 7 (37%) had near complete response. Among the 12 patients managed without surgery, median follow-up was 44.9 months. Three-year PFS was 92% (95% CI 54-99%), with one non-breast cancer-related death and no breast cancer recurrences. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes of decisional regret and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free