Evidence Hub

Long-Term Outcomes of Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy in Patients with Epstein-Barr Virus DNA-Selected Stage III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-Up Secondary Analysis of a Phase II Trial

Xiao YX, Yang JH, Sun XS, Liu LZ, Liu LT, Liu SL, Li XY, Li JB et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

215 participants

Abstract

Purpose: We previously reported that reduced-dose (60 Gy) radiation was associated with favorable survival outcomes and limited toxicities in patients with low-risk stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) sensitive to induction chemotherapy (IC). However, the consistency of long-term outcomes remains unclear.

Methods and materials: This 5-year follow-up secondary analysis of a single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with nonkeratinizing stage III NPC with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA <4000 copies/mL. All 215 eligible patients received 2 cycles of IC. After IC, 116 patients achieved complete response/partial response and undetectable EBV DNA, and they were assigned to receive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The remaining 99 patients were assigned to receive standard IMRT at 70 Gy in 33 fractions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.

Results: At a median follow-up of 68.1 months, the 5-year progression-free survival was 90.5% (95% CI, 85.3%-96.0%) in the 60 Gy cohort and 79.8% (72.3%-88.1%) in the 70 Gy cohort, whereas the 5-year overall survival was 96.6% (93.3%-99.9%) and 94.9% (90.7%-99.4%), respectively. The 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 93.1% in the 60 Gy cohort and 82.8% in the 70 Gy cohort; the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival was 93.1% in the 60 Gy cohort and 89.9% in the 70 Gy cohort. No grade 3-4 late toxicity was observed in the 60 Gy group. In the 70 Gy cohort, 10.1% of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 215 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free