Evidence Hub

Phase I study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in inoperable breast cancer

De la Pinta C, Gamero V, Muriel A, Capuz AB, Moris R, Martin M, Alarza M, Montero A et al.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026

Abstract

Purpose: A significant percentage of elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer are not surgical candidates or refuse surgery, and exclusive hormone therapy offers poor local control. SABR, by delivering biologically ablative doses in a few fractions, could be a non-invasive and effective alternative. This phase I clinical trial's primary objective was to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SABR as a definitive treatment in this population.

Material and methods: A single-center, single-arm, phase I study was designed. Eligible patients were ≥70 years old with unifocal, T1-2N0 M0-1 breast cancer, considered inoperable or who refused surgery. A Fibonacci (3 + 3) dose-escalation design was used to deliver SABR to the primary tumor in 5 fractions. Dose levels were 36 Gy (Level 1), 38 Gy (Level 2), and 40 Gy (Level 3). The primary endpoint was dose-limiting adverse effects, defined as any ≥ Grade 3 events (per RTOG/Harris scales) within the first 6 months. Secondary endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Between March 2021 and March 2024, 10 patients (11 tumors) with a median age of 91 years (range: 83-96) were enrolled. Three patients received 36 Gy, three received 38 Gy, and four received 40 Gy. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range: 4-40), no dose-limiting adverse events were observed in any cohort, and thus the MTD was not reached. No acute adverse events were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free