Study protocol: MRI-based assessment of cerebral blood flow under pharmacologically elevated blood pressure in patients under general anesthesia, and in sedated ICU patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Abstract
Background: Maintaining cerebral perfusion during anesthesia and intensive care is critical, yet the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains poorly defined. In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), pharmacologically induced hypertension is commonly applied to support cerebral perfusion, but its effects are uncertain.
Methods: This protocol describes two parallel clinical studies using identical methodology. The first study population includes adults undergoing elective general anesthesia (MAP-ANE), and the second comprises sedated intensive care patients with aSAH (MAP-SAH). In both study populations, MAP will be increased stepwise with norepinephrine (NE) infusion under continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring, and CBF measured with phase-contrast MRI (PCMRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL), while near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) will be performed in parallel to evaluate its validity as a surrogate marker. The primary outcome is the change in total CBF between baseline and elevated MAP, directly testing whether induced hypertension increases CBF. Secondary outcomes include ASL perfusion changes, the slope of the MAP-CBF relationship, systemic-cerebral hemodynamic correlations, and NIRS responses.
Expected impact: These studies test the hypothesis that pharmacological MAP augmentation does not predictably increase CBF. By combining quantitative MRI with invasive monitoring, it aims to clarify MAP-CBF…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.