Evidence Hub

The prospective phase I "Flash-Skin I" trial: ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy implementation and quality assurance at a clinical linear accelerator

Dal Bello R, Psoroulas S, Flückiger D, Krayenbühl J, Moeckli R, Bailat C, Subiel A, Patallo IS et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: The combination of reduced normal tissue damage and unaffected tumor control is referred to as Flash-effect. This phenomenon has been observed with ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy in preclinical models. The Flash-Skin I (NCT06549439) treated seven patients with melanoma skin metastasis. The treatment protocol included 2 × 9 Gy UHDR followed by 1 × 9 Gy conventional radiotherapy. Here we report on the implementation of the study at a converted C-arm clinical linear accelerator.

Materials and methods: A dedicated preclinical radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) program was developed and the linac performance was validated for more than one year. Clinically, fourteen fractions of 9 Gy each were delivered with the 9 MeV UHDR electron linac. In-vivo measurements included: skin dose with radiochromic films, linac output with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD), pulse counting and inter-pulse stability with a scintillator, intra-pulse stability with a diamond detector.

Results: The preclinical RTQA identified reduced linac output, which prompted beam tuning and additional quality assurance. This formed the basis for initiation of the clinical trial and successful treatment of all seven patients. All fourteen UHDR fractions showed a dose accuracy within 4.6% or better. The number of delivered pulses consistently matched the planned value, and film measurements confirmed the skin dose. Intra- and inter-pulse stability were within…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free