Evidence Hub

Pre-operative proton versus photon-based chemoradiotherapy as an addition to best systemic therapy in the management of oesophageal cancer: protocol for the UK multi-centre randomised phase 2 PROTIEUS study

Radhakrishna G, Jones CM, Bleaney CW, Blackshaw J, Blencowe N, Brand D, Clarke CS, Gwynne S et al.

BMC cancer, 2026

170 participants

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Around 40% of patients present with locally advanced disease. Outcomes are poor, with 5-year survival of around 50% for locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and 60% for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Over a fifth of recurrences are locoregional. These may be reduced by the addition of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to best pre-operative systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). However, photon-based CRT is associated with a higher frequency of complications than chemotherapy alone. This study will explore whether, in patients with locally advanced OAC and OSCC managed with hypofractionated CRT following best pre-operative systemic therapy, the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) reduces post-operative complications when compared with photon-based treatment.

Methods/design: PROTIEUS is an investigator-initiated randomised multi-centre phase 2 trial aiming to recruit 170 patients with locally advanced OAC (n = 130) or OSCC (n = 40) from the UK National Health Service. Patients with locally advanced cT ≥ 2, N0-2 non-metastatic disease are eligible for inclusion and will be randomised 1:1 to receive 40.05 Gy (RBE) in 15 fractions over three weeks using either PBT or intensity modulated/rotational arc photon radiotherapy. All patients will receive three one-week cycles of concurrent intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel. CRT will be delivered following best pre-operative SACT. The primary endpoint…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 170 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free