Evidence Hub

Results of a Phase 1 Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Gene Therapy With AAV2-hAQP1 for Grade 2 and 3 Radiation-Induced Late Xerostomia and Parotid Gland Hypofunction

Brennan MT, Passineau MJ, Saunders D, Sroussi H, Gaudilliere D, Liu J, Dubois N, Fernandez A et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: Grade 2 and 3 late xerostomia is a chronic, debilitating complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. We assessed the safety and efficacy of AAV2-hAQP1 gene therapy as a treatment for this condition.

Methods and materials: Twenty-four participants who reported grade 2 and 3 late xerostomia at screening, ≥5 years after completing their final radiation therapy treatment (≥2 years if human papillomavirus-positive), were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study. AAV2-hAQP1 was delivered to the parotid gland(s) via cannulation of Stensen's duct. Twelve participants received AAV2-hAQP1 in 1 gland and 12 in both glands. Participants were followed for 12 months. Safety parameters included adverse events, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. Efficacy assessments included the Xerostomia-specific Questionnaire (XQ), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN), Global Rate of Change Questionnaire (GRCQ), and measurement of unstimulated whole saliva flow rates (UWSFR).

Results: No treatment-related serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and all participants completed the study. When the data from all cohorts were pooled, statistically significant improvements were seen on all patient-reported outcomes by day 30. These were maintained through month 12 with greater improvement in the bilateral cohort. At month 12, the mean percent change from baseline (%CFB) was -39.5%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free