Evidence Hub

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Guide Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in the Prone Position and Treatment Response in Clinical Stage 1 Hormone Sensitive Breast Cancer: A Phase 1/2 Study

Beyer S, Hawley J, Gokun Y, Yildiz VO, Wei L, Jhawar S, Crum A, Healy E et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

19 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: The challenges of postoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) include targeting inaccuracies and inability to measure tumor response. We hypothesized that the tumor could be targeted with preoperative APBI (pAPBI) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prone position with our established prone breast technique. This feasibility study aimed to assess the accuracy and tumor response of pAPBI using our MRI/computed tomography (CT)-guided prone technology.

Methods and materials: This prospective study enrolled patients aged >50 years with clinical stage IA ER+ breast cancer intending lumpectomy. Axillary ultrasound and MRI confirmed clinically negative nodes. Planning CT, MRI, and pAPBI (3850 cGy in 10 fractions twice a day) used the same prone immobilization platform. Another MRI was obtained 4 weeks after APBI to quantitatively measure tumor response. Lumpectomy was performed 4 to 6 weeks after pAPBI. Simon's 2-stage design required assessment after accrual of the first 19 patients for feasibility.

Results: Nineteen patients with clinical stage IA ER+/PR+/HER2- breast cancer with median age of 65 years (range, 51-78 years) completed pAPBI followed by lumpectomy and endocrine therapy. Median follow-up was 73.8 months (IQR, 58.6-82.5 months). Median clinical tumor size was 0.9 cm (IQR, 0.8-1.6 cm). There was complete pathologic response in 10.5% (2) patients and another 36.8% (7) were downstaged after pAPBI. MRI-detected tumor response significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free