Evidence Hub

Prospective exploratory pilot study of 18 F-FMISO PET/CT for assessing tumor hypoxia in soft tissue sarcomas

Sebro R, Fuller AM, Karin Eisenger-Matheson TS, Dulal C, Pantel AR, Shabason J, Levin W, Cooper K et al.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026

Abstract

Hypoxia is associated with poor outcomes in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and is linked to increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), and lysyl hydroxylase 2 (PLOD2). These factors are potential therapeutic targets. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the correlation between 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, a marker of hypoxia, and the expression of these biomarkers in STS. This imaging phase II clinical trial (NCT #03730077) recruited 5 patients with suspected soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and imaged these patients with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18F-FMISO within 2 weeks of each other. STS tissue was analyzed for HIF-1α, CAIX, and PLOD2 expression using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. Collagen formation was assessed by Masson's trichrome. In this small sample, a correlation was found between STS size and PLOD2 expression (r = 0.996, P = 0.004). STS grade correlated positively with 18F-FMISO T/M (tumor/muscle) SUVmax (r = 0.894, P = 0.041). 18F-FDG correlated positively with 18F-FMISO SUVmax (r = 0.994, P = 0.006). Positive but non-significant associations were noted between 18F-FMISO T/M SUVmax and CAIX (r = 0.95, P > 0.05) and PLOD2 (r = 0.93, P > 0.05). These preliminary observations in a small sample are hypothesis-generating at best and must be interpreted with substantial caution due to the extremely limited number of patients, which precludes robust…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free