Evidence Hub

Immune MRD Status Informs Tumor MRD Outcome Prognostication in Patients with Multiple Myeloma on Lenalidomide Maintenance

Firestone RS, Simhal AK, McAvoy D, Jurgens EM, Garcés JJ, Nemirovsky D, Derkach A, Maclachlan KH et al.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Lenalidomide (Len) maintenance is the most frequently utilized approach for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma following induction therapy with/without consolidative high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. Baseline and longitudinal measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status is a well-established positive predictive sign in Len maintenance patients. However, the clinical utility of serial MRD assessments remains uncertain, as there is no consensus on the clinical management of MRD resurgence (MRDres) or stable remissions in patients positive for MRD.

Patients and methods: In this study, we report the complete and final results of a phase II, single-arm study of 5 years of continuous Len maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma following unrestricted upfront therapy, along with exploratory peripheral blood T cell profiling experiments performed via high-dimensional spectral cytometry.

Results: Patients with MRDres had inferior progression-free survival compared with those with sustained MRD negativity at the 1- and 2-year landmarks (P = 0.036, P = 0.0014, respectively); however, myeloma progression only occurred within 2 years of MRDres in 36% of patients, with no progression observed in the remaining 64% of patients at the last follow-up. Exploratory peripheral blood T cell profiling experiments throughout the trial period identified an immune signature of early relapse in patient cohorts both negative and positive for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free