Evidence Hub

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with afatinib for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (neoCHANCE-2): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

Wei Z, Chen H, Wang D, Li L, Pei Y, Yang H, Wang F, Jin J et al.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026

40 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitor-based neoadjuvant therapy shows promise in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), the optimal regimen has yet to be established. We report, for the first time, a neoadjuvant treatment that combines chemotherapy with dual blockade of the programmed cell death protein 1 and epidermal growth factor receptor pathways in LA-HNSCC.

Methods: In this single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT05516589) conducted at a single academic center, patients with LA-HNSCC were enrolled and received two cycles of tislelizumab and TP chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin), administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, along with afatinib during the interval between chemoimmunotherapy cycles, followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoint was the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant treatment, 32 of whom proceeded to surgical resection; among these patients, the pCR rate was 40.6% (95% CI 23.7% to 59.4%). The ORR was 82.5% (95% CI 67.2% to 92.7%). The 1-year OS rate was 97.3% (95% CI 92.2% to 100%). The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of grade 3-4 was lymphopenia (5/40, 12.5%). No grade 5 TRAEs leading to death occurred, and no treatment-related surgical delays were observed. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free