Evidence Hub

Quality assurance of contouring and dosimetric consistency in the GETUG-AFU 31 salvage prostate stereotactic reirradiation trial

Tonneau M, Bartau C, Lacornerie T, Brihoum M, Pasquier D, GETUG 31 investigators

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

Abstract

Background and purpose: Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) represents a promising approach for managing intraprostatic recurrence following radiotherapy. The multicenter phase I/II GETUG-AFU 31 trial evaluated 6 × 6 Gy SBRT, with delineation and dosimetric dummy runs performed to ensure consistent target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation and treatment plan quality across centers. We report the outcomes of this pre-accrual quality reassurance process.

Materials and methods: Eighteen centers received CT, PET, and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) datasets of recurrent lesions and contoured the gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), prostate, bladder/rectum (whole and wall), penile bulb, and urethra + 3 mm. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (HD avg) were calculated against an expert reference. Each center subsequently generated a 6 × 6-Gy plan on another anonymized dataset. Dose-volume indices were compared with the protocol limits. Major deviations were subsequently revised.

Results: Of the 18 centers, 5 (28 %) required resubmission. Variability was high for the GTV (median DSC: 0.63 [interquartile range {IQR}: 0.45-0.70; HD avg: >1.8 mm), CTV: (0.79 [0.71-0.82]; HDavg: >1.8 mm), and urethra: (0.10 [0.05-0.26]; HD avg: >3.6 mm). Larger structures showed higher agreement: bladder, 0.93; rectum, 0.85; prostate, 0.85. All revised plans satisfied constraints: CTV Dmedian > 38.1 ± 1.4 Gy; rectal-wall V27Gy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free