Evidence Hub

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Trial of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients With Mild-to-Severe COPD

Collins SÉ, Kirby M, Smith BM, Rampuri ZH, Fuhr DP, Rowland S, Brotto AR, Rosychuk RJ et al.

Chest, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced COPD have pulmonary vascular dysfunction and destruction; thus, it is unclear whether they are responsive to selective pulmonary vasodilators.

Research question: What is the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) on exercise capacity in patients without hypoxemia with mild-to-severe COPD without pulmonary hypertension, and are there structural and/or functional predictors of response?

Study design and methods: Sixty-one patients with mild-to-severe COPD (mean FEV1, 65% ± 18% predicted) were recruited to this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-anonymized, crossover trial. Assessments included pulmonary function, echocardiography, and quantitative CT scan. Small vessel volume fraction, defined as the vascular volume of blood vessels with a cross-sectional area 2 (BV5) divided by total vascular volume (TVV), was used as an index of small vessel perfusion or pulmonary vascular pruning. Participants received iNO or placebo (randomized) during 2 separate incremental exercise tests to determine exercise capacity (peak rate of oxygen consumption [Vo2peak]).

Results: The mean effect of iNO on Vo2peak was 0.36 mL/kg/min (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.89) in an unadjusted linear mixed effects model. In prespecified analyses, there was evidence of iNO effect modification by BV5/TVV, whereby higher BV5/TVV was associated with greater iNO-induced improvement in Vo2peak (adjusted mean change, 0.14 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, 0.02-0.26 per 1% increment in BV5/TVV),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free