Evidence Hub

Outcomes of a Phase II Interventional Clinical Trial of Prostate Bed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Features Following Radical Prostatectomy

Vargas CE, Voss MM, Dodoo C, Niska JR, Wong W, Zhu A, Keole SR, Rwigema JC et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study reports the safety and efficacy outcomes of a phase II prospective trial evaluating stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the prostate bed in patients with high-risk features following radical prostatectomy.

Methods and materials: Between May 2018 and May 2020, 49 patients were enrolled and stratified into 3 groups based on clinical context: group I (adjuvant SBRT, PSA < 0.2 ng/mL with adverse features such as positive margins, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), or extraprostatic extension), group II (salvage SBRT, PSA ≥ 0.2 and <2.0 ng/mL), and group III (oligometastatic disease, ≤5 sites). Patients with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL underwent staging with C11 positron emission tomography (PET); those with biochemical failure following treatment were restaged with PSMA PET. All patients received SBRT to the prostate bed to a total dose of 30 to 32 Gy in 5 fractions administered every other day. Patients in the salvage and oligometastatic groups received 6 and 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), respectively. The primary endpoint was freedom from failure (FFF), defined as a PSA < 0.5 ng/mL without clinical progression or reinitiation of ADT. Secondary endpoints included FFF with a PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, toxicity rates (graded per CTCAE v5.0), clinical failure, and FFF in early salvage patients (PSA 0.2 to <0.5 ng/mL).

Results: The median follow-up was 60 months. High-risk features included extraprostatic extension in 49%, SVI in 10%, positive margins in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free