Evidence Hub

Single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) vs whole laryngeal radiotherapy in the treatment of T1aN0 glottic cancer A prospective randomized trial

Elsharief MM, Hassouna AH, Shouman T, Mosallam A, El-Badrawy A, Shawky A, Amin A, Abdelfatah SM

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

57 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Both Transoral laser surgery (TLS) and radiotherapy are used in the treatment of T1aN0 glottic cancer with similar oncological outcomes. Retrospective studies suggest excellent local control with single vocal cord irradiation that targets only the affected vocal cord. So, the aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome and toxicity of the classic radiotherapy field vs single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) technique.

Patients and methods: This is a prospective phase 2 randomized study (clinicaltrial.gov registration NCT05679856). A total of 57 patients with T1aN0 glottic cancer were randomized. 28 were assigned to standard of care whole larynx radiotherapy that covers the whole larynx with a prescription dose of 63 Gy/28 Fractions (Fs) The remaining 29 patients were randomized to single vocal irradiation with a prescription dose of 58.08 Gy/16Fs. The primary endpoint was to prove superiority of SVCI in terms of voice quality by comparing voice handicap index (VHI) between the 2 study arms. Baseline VHI was recorded before treatment, at end of radiotherapy, then during each follow up visit.

Results: Demographic and patients' characteristics were comparable between the 2 arms. The doses to different organs at risk were statistically lower in the SVCI arm. 2-year local control rate was 100% in SVCI arm and 96% in the whole larynx arm, with no significant difference. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reported in both treatment arms. Patients in the SVCI arm…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 57 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free