Evidence Hub

Primary Endpoint Analysis of the Phase 2 DESTINATION-MRL Trial for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Dassen MG, Tree AC, Wiersema L, Neijndorff B, de Ruiter P, van der Linden J, Mitchell A, Dunlop A et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

46 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Escalating dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV) while de-escalating dose to the prostate clinical target volume (CTV) and using a 0-mm planning target volume margin can potentially minimize toxicity without compromising biochemical control in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the technical feasibility of this approach in online adaptive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Methods and materials: The DESTINATION-MRL trial ran as 3 parallel single-center phase 2 non-randomized trials in 3 different institutes. Each institute enrolled 20 patients who were all treated on a 1.5T Unity MR-linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The GTV was defined as tumor(s) visible on multiparametric MRI. The CTV was defined as the whole prostate. The proximal 1-2 cm of the seminal vesicles were included in the CTV at the clinician's discretion. An intraprostatic margin of 4 mm was applied to the GTV to account for delineation and pathological uncertainty (GTV 4 mm) and no planning target volume margin was applied to the CTV. All patients were treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the CTV and an isotoxic boost of 45 Gy to the GTV 4 mm. The primary endpoint was technical feasibility, defined as an accumulated GTV D90% of >42 Gy on the post-treatment MRI in ≥90% of the patients.

Results: Between May 2023 and September 2024, 60 patients were treated, of which 54 were included for analysis. An accumulated GTV D90% of >42 Gy was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free